The term Christian Nationalism has rapidly become a buzzword in American political discourse, especially among the Left and progressive elites. It is frequently used as a pejorative, meant to conjure fears of authoritarianism, theocracy, and a loss of pluralistic freedom. But a crucial question remains largely unanswered: is it really Christian Nationalism that the Left fears—or is it simply Christianity?
This blog post will examine the difference between Christian Nationalism and broader Christian engagement with politics, explain the diversity of Christian views on the role of faith in government, analyze the Left’s deeper ideological motives, and explore the philosophical and theological reasons behind their hostility. Through both the Christian and Philosopher’s lens, we will uncover what is at stake and what pitfalls even well-meaning Christians must avoid.
Christianity and the State: A Spectrum of Views
Throughout history, Christians have held a wide range of beliefs about how Christianity should relate to civil government. These views often differ based on denominational traditions, theological priorities, and particularly eschatological outlooks—beliefs about the end times.
1. Two Kingdoms View (Lutheran and Reformed)
This doctrine distinguishes between the spiritual kingdom (the Church) and the civil kingdom (the State). Christians are citizens of both but should not conflate them. While this view encourages political engagement, it denies that the State should enforce specifically Christian doctrine. It stresses moral influence over direct imposition.
2. Theonomy and Christian Reconstructionism
Theonomists argue that God’s law, including aspects of the Old Testament civil code, should be implemented by governments today. They see civil rulers as God’s ministers (Romans 13) obligated to uphold His revealed law. This view is rare but often cited by critics to define “Christian Nationalism.”
3. Postmillennial Optimism
Postmillennialists believe the Gospel will triumph progressively through the nations before Christ returns. Thus, they often support the idea of Christendom—a Christianized culture and polity. This outlook encourages long-term nation-building based on biblical principles.
4. Premillennial Disengagement
Many Dispensational premillennialists, especially in Evangelical circles, believe that the world is destined for worsening apostasy before Christ’s return. This view often leads to political disengagement or minimalistic involvement, believing reform is ultimately futile in the present age.
5. Amillennial Realism
Amillennialists tend to view the Church’s mission as primarily spiritual, even though many support moral influence on society. The kingdom of God is already present spiritually and will be consummated at Christ’s return. This leads to a balanced, often cautious, view of civil power.
What the Left Says It Fears: Christian Nationalism
The progressive media-industrial complex frequently warns of a creeping theocracy. From the New York Times to MSNBC, headlines proclaim that the “Christian Right” is planning to take over the government and impose biblical law on a secular society. But what precisely is Christian Nationalism, and is this fear justified?
The term is notoriously slippery. Critics define it as:
- A desire for the U.S. government to privilege Christianity;
- Belief that America has a divine destiny;
- Attempts to fuse church and state power;
- Support for biblical moral laws in the civil sphere.
Yet these definitions often confuse mere cultural Christianity or civic moral concern with an actual drive toward theocracy. Few Christians advocate for a priest-king model akin to Iran’s Islamic regime.
The real question is whether the Left’s fear matches reality—or whether it is strategically exaggerated to demonize conservative Christians.
What the Left Actually Fears: Christianity Itself
Through the Philosopher’s lens, one must analyze presuppositions. The modern Left is steeped in secular humanism, moral relativism, and Neo-Marxist power theory. Christianity threatens all three pillars.
- Objective Moral Law
Christianity asserts a transcendent moral order rooted in the character of God. This threatens moral relativism, especially on issues like abortion, gender, marriage, and sexuality. It sets limits on autonomy, the Left’s sacred cow.
- Non-State Authority
Biblical Christianity teaches that the ultimate allegiance is to Christ, not the State. This decentralizes power and undermines statism. Progressivism, by contrast, tends toward increasing State control of education, healthcare, speech, and family structures.
- Evangelism and Truth Claims
Christianity declares exclusive truth in Christ. This is heresy in a pluralist worldview that treats all religions as equally valid—or equally suspect. The Left sees proselytism not as loving, but as coercive.
- Resistance to Cultural Deconstruction
Christianity affirms created realities—male and female, family, sin, and salvation. These foundational doctrines stand in opposition to the deconstructionist goals of gender theory, racial Marxism, and postmodern identity politics.
In short, the issue is not merely how Christians engage politics, but that they believe truth exists outside the progressive narrative. The fear is of Christianity’s influence, not its governance.
Why the Left Cheers Islamic Theocracy but Fears Christian Government
It seems paradoxical: the same progressives who decry Christian influence in America often defend repressive Islamic regimes such as Hamas-controlled Gaza. Why?
- Anti-Western Sentiment
Islamic regimes, especially anti-Israel ones, are viewed as victims of Western imperialism. Christianity is seen as a pillar of that imperialism. The Left interprets history through the lens of colonizer and colonized.
- Strategic Allyship
In the Marxist playbook, all who oppose the current power structure (defined as white, Christian, male, capitalist) are potential allies. Islam, despite its actual repression of women and homosexuals, is used as a political counterweight to Western Christian influence.
- Cultural Relativism and Fear of Islamophobia
Criticizing Islam risks being labeled Islamophobic, a cardinal sin in progressive orthodoxy. But attacking Christianity is not only acceptable—it’s celebrated as brave resistance.
- Functional Atheism
Many on the Left don’t believe Islam is really true either; they assume it will secularize in time. They fear Christianity because it has not conformed. It remains a living, breathing rival religion.
Is the Left Using Fear of Christian Nationalism to Scare America?
Yes—strategically so.
- Political Weaponization: Accusations of Christian Nationalism are increasingly used to silence pro-life advocacy, school board activism, and opposition to gender indoctrination.
- Suppressing Speech: The term functions like “white supremacist”—broad, undefined, and used to socially stigmatize dissenters.
- Election Strategy: Democrats use fear of Christian nationalism to rally their base, painting GOP candidates as theocrats.
- Media Framing: Coverage of Christians in politics often emphasizes “dominionism,” “extremism,” or “threats to democracy,” even when no credible plan for religious rule exists.
This is not about preventing a theocracy—it’s about preserving cultural dominance.
Would a Christian Government Cause Problems?
Yes, if not carefully grounded in biblical principles of humility, separation of powers, and liberty of conscience.
- Conflating Church and State
Even well-meaning Christians could attempt to enforce church discipline through law—a distortion of biblical ecclesiology. - Tribalism and Denominational Conflict
Which version of Christianity governs? Baptist? Catholic? Pentecostal? This invites fragmentation and coercion. - Temptation to Authoritarianism
Righteous goals pursued through coercive means risk repeating the errors of Constantinianism or Puritan Massachusetts. - Corruption of the Gospel
When Christianity becomes a tool of the State, it often loses its prophetic voice and becomes a mouthpiece of power. - Persecution of Dissenters
Religious liberty must be preserved. A forced Christianity is a false Christianity.
This does not mean Christians should avoid government—but they must build it on justice, not domination.
Conclusion
So is it Christian Nationalism that the Left truly fears? Or is it Christianity—orthodox, moral, evangelistic, and enduring—that threatens their ideological empire?
Using both the Christian and Philosopher’s lens, the answer is clear: the progressive movement fears the truth claims, moral clarity, and societal influence of Christianity. Their opposition is not merely to a political model but to the spiritual authority behind it.
Christians should not be frightened into silence. Nor should they fall into triumphalist delusions. Rather, they should engage the public square with courage, humility, and clarity—proclaiming Christ as King not because they seek earthly domination, but because they know the true Kingdom will come in His time.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
rob@basedchristianity.org
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
Some sources of information may reflect a libertarian and/or atheistic perspective. I may not agree with all of their opinions, but they offer some worthwhile comments on the topic under discussion.
Additionally, language used in the videos may be coarse. Coarse language does not reflect my personal standards.
Finally, those on the left often criticize my sources of information, which are primarily conservative and/or Christian. Truth is truth, regardless of how we feel about it. Leftists are largely led by their emotion rather than facts. It is no small wonder that they would criticize the sources that I provide. And, ultimately, my wordview is governed by Scripture. Many of my critics are not biblical Christians.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at rob@basedchristianity.org if you want to comment on something, though.
I will continue to add items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.