For generations, the American public has placed a high level of trust in the medical community. From the local family doctor to the world-class specialist, physicians were once seen as stewards of objective science and patient-first ethics. But in the 21st century, especially over the past decade, that image has been profoundly altered. The rise of gender ideology and the forceful implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) mandates have radically reshaped many of the institutions that train, license, accredit, employ, and discipline medical professionals.
These changes have implications for every corner of American life. For parents, this means that a pediatrician or family doctor may be influenced—or required—to promote transgender treatments to your child, potentially without your knowledge or consent. For aspiring Christian physicians, this means facing ideological litmus tests during medical training, certification, and even job applications. And for the everyday patient, it means that ideology may sometimes override ethics and science in the very institutions tasked with your care.
This essay will explore the extent of this compromise, name the institutions involved, and offer critical insight for navigating this new medical terrain.
The National Medical Associations: Complicity and Enforcement
The ideological reshaping of the medical field begins with its most powerful associations.
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Role: Political lobbying, professional standards, public health policy.
- Complicity: The AMA has aggressively supported gender ideology, calling for the removal of sex markers on birth certificates, mandating the use of “affirming” language, and redefining ethical obligations to align with transgender activism.
- Risk: Physicians who dissent risk complaints of “discrimination” or “unprofessional conduct.”
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Role: Authoritative body for child healthcare guidance.
- Complicity: Promotes hormonal interventions, puberty blockers, and even surgeries for minors. The AAP has resisted internal criticism, suppressing voices of pediatricians who object on scientific or ethical grounds.
- Risk: Pediatricians who question the transgender standard of care face professional isolation and potential censure.
- American Psychiatric Association (APA) and American Psychological Association
- Role: Mental health standards and certification.
- Complicity: Endorses gender “affirming” therapy as best practice. Classifies alternative views as “conversion therapy.”
- Risk: Mental health professionals who counsel caution may lose licensure or face ethics complaints.
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)
- Role: Accredits residency and fellowship programs nationwide.
- Complicity: Requires DEI and gender ideology training as part of curriculum. Non-compliance can jeopardize program accreditation.
- Risk: Aspiring doctors cannot graduate without submitting to ideological training.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
- Role: Professional association for OB-GYNs.
- Complicity: Supports inclusive terminology (e.g., “birthing person”), abortion on demand, and gender-affirming procedures.
- Risk: Faith-based practitioners face exclusion and reprimand.
State-Level Pressures: Woke Medicine in Progressive (Blue) Strongholds
In Democrat-controlled states like California, Oregon, and Washington, national ideological pressures are amplified through local law and institutional policies.
- State Medical Boards
- Example: California Medical Board
- Power: Can revoke licenses for alleged “misinformation” or “discrimination.”
- Case in Point: California passed AB 2098 in 2022 (since paused), which allowed revocation of licenses for physicians who expressed dissenting COVID views. Similar frameworks are likely for gender ideology.
- Medical Schools and Hospital Systems
- Examples: UCSF, University of Washington Medicine, OHSU (Oregon Health & Science University)
- DEI Statements: Required for hiring, promotion, and sometimes admissions.
- Gender Ideology: Integrated into curriculum, often as unquestioned doctrine.
- Credentialing Committees in Hospitals
- Power: Determine which physicians can practice in their facilities.
- Ideological Enforcement: May require DEI training and evidence of affirming care for LGBTQ+ patients.
- Result: Faith-based objections may disqualify physicians from practicing.
State-Level Pressures : Woke Medicine in Conservative (Red) Strongholds
In Republican-controlled states like Indiana, the pressure is less. The influence of national accrediting bodies and medical associations persists, though.
- State Boards in Indiana and Similar States
- Less aggressive but still influenced by federal and national norms.
- Risk: Boards could be pressured by lawsuits or activist media to discipline Christian doctors.
- Indiana University School of Medicine
- Public university adopting DEI initiatives.
- Curricula aligned with AAMC and ACGME mandates.
- Hospital Systems
- Large systems like IU Health and Ascension often follow Joint Commission and Medicare compliance standards that include gender ideology components.
Specialties Most At Risk for Ideological Conflict
The following specialties are particularly dangerous for Christian practitioners or vulnerable to ideologically driven malpractice against minors:
| Specialty | Risk Level | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Pediatrics | 🔴 High | Direct access to minors; aggressive trans-affirming policies. |
| Psychiatry | 🔴 High | Affirms all gender identities; refusal = “conversion therapy.” |
| Family Medicine | 🟠 Moderate | Often initiates gender conversations with minors. |
| OB-GYN | 🔴 High | Pressured to use gender-neutral terms, provide trans care. |
| Endocrinology | 🟠 Moderate/High | Hormone therapy is core to trans medicine. |
| Emergency Medicine | 🟡 Medium | Risk from refusal to comply with gender preferences during acute care. |
| Plastic Surgery | 🟡 Medium | Pressured to perform or refer for gender-altering procedures. |
The Patient’s Risk: Parents, Be Alert
Parents must understand: the medical community no longer operates under a universal assumption of objectivity and neutrality. A trusted pediatrician or school-affiliated therapist might:
- Encourage your child to consider a different “gender identity” privately.
- Initiate referrals for gender clinics or endocrinologists without your knowledge.
- Use inclusive language like “assigned male at birth” or “chestfeeding” without consent.
- View parental concern as a form of psychological harm or abuse.
In some states, minor confidentiality laws allow children to receive gender-related treatment without parental permission or awareness. A parent may be legally excluded from discussions, even when permanent bodily harm is on the table.
The Aspiring Physician’s Dilemma: Ideological Gatekeeping
Young Christians pursuing a career in medicine face unprecedented barriers:
- Medical School Admission: Increasingly depends on DEI essays and ideological conformity.
- Residency Programs: Must comply with gender-affirming training or risk being expelled.
- Board Certification: Specialty boards may deny certification to dissenters.
- Hospital Privileges: Credentialing processes can be used to weed out “non-inclusive” doctors.
In short, ideological orthodoxy is becoming a condition for entry, progression, and success in modern medicine.
Conclusion: Standing Firm in a Compromised System
The capture of America’s medical institutions by gender ideology and DEI orthodoxy represents a profound crisis—both for ethical medicine and for religious liberty. But it also offers a clarifying moment.
- For Parents: Research your doctors. Ask about their views. Monitor private conversations with your children. Your trust must be earned.
- For Aspiring Physicians: Be prepared to suffer for your convictions. Seek out institutions with a reputation for tolerance of conscience. Connect with Christian medical groups that advocate for integrity.
- For All Believers: Pray for courage and clarity. Speak truth in love. And support those who resist this tide, not just with words—but with real institutional alternatives.
Let us not forget: Christ calls His people to be salt and light. In a medical field rapidly losing its moral compass, the presence of godly men and women who fear God more than man has never been more essential.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
rob@basedchristianity.org
RELATED CONTENT
Chloe Cole and Luke Healy are “detransitioners”. Both are thoughtful individuals who outline the factors that led to their gender dysphoria and subsequent events including their detransition.
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
Some sources of information may reflect a libertarian and/or atheistic perspective. I may not agree with all of their opinions, but they offer some worthwhile comments on the topic under discussion.
Additionally, language used in the videos may be coarse. Coarse language does not reflect my personal standards.
Finally, those on the left often criticize my sources of information, which are primarily conservative and/or Christian. Truth is truth, regardless of how we feel about it. Leftists are largely led by their emotion rather than facts. It is no small wonder that they would criticize the sources that I provide. And, ultimately, my wordview is governed by Scripture. Many of my critics are not biblical Christians.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at rob@basedchristianity.org if you want to comment on something, though.
I will continue to add items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.