The Doctrines of Grace, aka the Five Points of Calvinism, are a concise summary of Reformed soteriology.
These doctrines address how God saves sinners, highlighting divine sovereignty, human inability, and the effectiveness of Christ’s atonement.
They are represented by the acronym TULIP:
- Total Depravity
- Unconditional Election
- Limited Atonement
- Irresistible Grace
- Perseverance of the Saints
Historical Development Prior to the Reformation
Though fully articulated during the Reformation and post-Reformation period, the doctrines have roots in early Christian theology.
A. Patristic Roots: Augustine of Hippo (354–430)
- Augustine strongly affirmed original sin, divine election, and persevering grace in his debates with Pelagius.
- His views on predestination and grace laid the foundation for later Calvinistic doctrines.
B. Medieval Witnesses
Though Roman Catholic theology drifted toward semi-Pelagianism, some within the Church echoed Augustinian themes:
- Gottschalk of Orbais (9th century) taught double predestination and was condemned.
- Thomas Bradwardine (14th century), Archbishop of Canterbury, upheld Augustinian predestinarian views.
- Gregory of Rimini (14th century) argued for limited atonement and total depravity.
C. The Jansenists
- A 17th-century Roman Catholic movement that upheld Augustinian grace theology.
- Notable Jansenists: Cornelius Jansen, Blaise Pascal.
- They were fiercely opposed by the Jesuits and eventually condemned by the Pope.
- Jansenists held to total depravity, predestination, and irresistible grace, though remaining within the Catholic Church.
Reformation and Post-Reformation
A. Martin Luther
- In The Bondage of the Will (1525), Luther strongly affirmed total depravity and sovereign grace.
- He did not use the five-point framework but was monergistic and Augustinian in soteriology.
B. John Calvin
- Calvin systematized Reformed theology but never used the TULIP acronym.
- He affirmed:
- Human depravity and inability
- Sovereign, unconditional election
- Particular redemption (though nuanced)
- Effectual calling
- Assurance of perseverance
- Calvin would not have called himself a “Calvinist”—a term coined by others, often opponents.
The Synod of Dort and the Five Points
In 1610, followers of Jacobus Arminius presented five articles challenging Reformed orthodoxy. In response, the Synod of Dort (1618–1619) formulated the five points of Calvinism.
Arminian Articles (1610, “Remonstrance”):
- Free will and partial depravity
- Conditional election
- Universal atonement
- Resistible grace
- Uncertain perseverance
Calvinist Response (1619, Canons of Dort):
- Total Depravity
- Unconditional Election
- Limited Atonement
- Irresistible Grace
- Perseverance of the Saints
Scriptural Support for Each Point
| Doctrines of Grace | Scriptures |
|---|---|
| T – Total Depravity | Rom 3:10–12; Eph 2:1–3; Gen 6:5; Jer 17:9; 1 Cor 2:14 |
| U – Unconditional Election | Rom 9:11–23; Eph 1:4–5; John 6:37, 44; Acts 13:48; 2 Tim 1:9 |
| L – Limited Atonement | John 10:11, 15; Matt 1:21; Isa 53:12; Rev 5:9; Eph 5:25 |
| I – Irresistible Grace | John 6:37–39; Rom 8:30; Ezek 36:26–27; Phil 2:13; Acts 16:14 |
| P – Perseverance of the Saints | John 10:28–29; Rom 8:38–39; Phil 1:6; 1 Pet 1:5; Heb 7:25 |
Comparison: Calvinism vs. Arminianism
| Doctrine | Calvinism | Arminianism |
|---|---|---|
| Human Condition | Total Depravity | Partial Depravity |
| Election | Unconditional Election | Conditional Election |
| Atonement | Limited (Definite) Atonement | Universal Atonement |
| Grace | Irresistible Grace | Resistible Grace |
| Perseverance | Perseverance of the Saints | Conditional Security |
Did Arminius Differ on All Five Points?
- Arminius affirmed:
- Depravity, though he nuanced it with prevenient grace.
- Perseverance, though not dogmatically.
- His followers pushed further toward synergism.
- Arminius’s theology was less radical than later Wesleyan Arminians.
Beyond Labels: Monergism vs. Synergism
- Monergism (Calvinism): Salvation is God’s work alone.
- Synergism (Arminianism, semi-Pelagianism): Salvation involves cooperation between God and man.
- Better terms may be “sovereign grace” vs. “free willism”, as “Calvinist” and “Arminian” are often misunderstood labels.
On Determinism: Compatibilism and Freedom
- Hard Determinism: All events, including human choices, are determined.
- Libertarian Free Will: Choices are not determined by prior causes.
- Compatibilism: God’s sovereignty and human responsibility coexist.
- Most Calvinists affirm compatibilism, especially as articulated by Jonathan Edwards and James White.
Caricatures and Misunderstandings
False Views of Calvinism:
- “Calvinists think God is a puppet master.”
→ Response: No, God ordains means and ends; humans act freely yet under providence. - “Calvinists deny evangelism.”
→ Response: Historically false—Calvinists have led missionary movements.
False Views of Freewillers:
- “Arminians are all Pelagians.”
→ Response: Most Arminians affirm original sin and the necessity of grace. - “Freewillers hate God’s sovereignty.”
→ Response: Many uphold divine sovereignty, though inconsistently.
Prominent Figures in the Debate
Calvinists:
- James White – Alpha & Omega Ministries; numerous debates on Reformed theology.
- R.C. Sproul – Founder of Ligonier Ministries; author of Chosen by God.
- Tom Ascol – Founders Ministries; Southern Baptist Reformed advocate.
Freewillers:
- Leighton Flowers – Director of Soteriology 101; focuses heavily on refuting Calvinism.
- Dave Hunt – Author of What Love Is This?; deeply opposed to Calvinism.
- Roger Olson – Arminian theologian and critic of Calvinist determinism.
Core Principles of Calvinism and Responses
| Principle | Freewiller Critique | Calvinist Response |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereign Election | “Unfair favoritism” | God’s grace is unmerited; justice = hell for all |
| Total Inability | “Makes people robots” | Scripture teaches spiritual death, not sickness |
| Limited Atonement | “Restricts Christ’s love” | Christ saves infallibly, not hypothetically |
| Irresistible Grace | “Violates free will” | Regeneration changes the will, doesn’t coerce |
| Perseverance | “Leads to licentiousness” | True believers bear fruit and persevere |
Recommended Resources
- The Five Points of Calvinism – David Steele, Curtis Thomas
- Chosen by God – R.C. Sproul
- Debating Calvinism – James White vs. Dave Hunt
- The Potter’s Freedom – James White (response to Norman Geisler
Conclusion: Gracious Clarity in the Midst of Controversy
The debate between Calvinism and Arminianism ultimately revolves around the glory of God in salvation and the freedom or bondage of the human will. Though the terms “Calvinist” and “Arminian” are useful shorthand, we should remember they are often over-simplified and misused. At its heart, the issue is one of monergism vs. synergism, grace alone vs. grace plus free will.
Let the words of Scripture be our guide and Augustine’s old prayer be our anthem:
“Command what you will, and grant what you command.”
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com
RELATED CONTENT
This simplified introduction to the doctrines of grace is a good overview of the doctrines of grace. I do not know the reputation of the content creator. I have viewed some of his videos in the past and they are fine but I don’t vouch for all his content. The content in this video is fine. He has a nice, clear voice and great teaching methods.
Allie Beth Stuckey has a great podcast called Relateable. She has a great personality and would make a fine Sunday School teacher. Perhaps she is a Sunday School teacher. In this episode, she discusses the Five Points of Calvinism.
Dr. Sinclair Ferguson is associated with Ligonier Ministries. He speaks about the topic of the doctrines of grace in this video.
Dr. R.C. Sproul introduces the topic of Reformed theology in this video. Dr. Sproul was the best modern-day theologian gifted in communication to the common man, in my opinion. Reformed theology encompasses much more than TULIP.
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
I think the content is worthwhile, but it may contain opinions or language I don’t agree with.
Realize that I sometimes use phrases like “trans man”, “trans woman”, “transgender” or similar language for ease of communication. Obviously, as a conservative Christian, I don’t believe anyone has ever become the opposite sex.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com if you want to comment on something afterwards, though.
I will continue to add videos and other items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.