Few issues have captured the global political imagination like climate change. Once referred to as “global warming,” the term has evolved into a broader concept that now encapsulates everything from rising sea levels to migration policy. For many activists and global institutions, climate change is not only real—it’s an imminent existential threat demanding immediate transformation of our economies, lifestyles, and even liberties. Others, including many conservative scientists, economists, and theologians, urge caution: the science is more complex, the models more uncertain, and the policy solutions often laden with ulterior motives.
This post offers a comprehensive analysis of climate change through scientific, political, ideological, and Christian lenses—providing readers with a thoughtful framework for discerning what is real, what is exaggerated, and what is deeply misleading. Most importantly, it reminds us that we are not alone: God is sovereign over the Earth He created, and He designed a world in which human beings are not helpless victims of nature, but stewards with remarkable capacity for adaptation, resilience, and moral responsibility.
1. Scientific Data: Is Climate Change Real?
Yes—climate change is a real phenomenon. The Earth’s climate has changed throughout history, with alternating periods of warming and cooling. Current scientific measurements show that global average surface temperatures have increased by about 1.2°C (2.2°F) since the late 19th century. This warming trend is documented by satellite data, oceanic temperature readings, and glacial retreat. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and NASA both maintain that the planet is currently experiencing a warming trend that is unusual in its speed and intensity.
But the question is not merely whether change is occurring—it’s what is causing it, how severe it will be, and what should be done about it.
Moreover, archaeological and anthropological evidence provides important context. In recent years, human remains and artifacts have been discovered beneath melting glaciers and ice sheets, suggesting that those regions were once habitable, not permanently frozen. These findings are not mere footnotes—they’re evidence of historical climate variability. The Earth has warmed and cooled many times, long before the industrial era, underscoring the importance of distinguishing between natural cycles and human-induced changes.
2. Weather vs. Climate: A Critical Distinction
Weather refers to short-term atmospheric conditions—daily temperature, precipitation, humidity. Climate refers to long-term patterns in a given region or globally, typically measured over decades. So, while a cold winter or mild summer does not disprove climate change, long-term global trends in temperature, ice cover, and ocean levels are the true benchmarks of climate evaluation.
Importantly, weather is chaotic, but climate is patterned. Yet both are ultimately under God’s sovereign control (Job 38:22–30), and Christians do well to remember that neither natural forces nor computer models have the final word. God does.
3. Is Man Causing Climate Change?
There is broad scientific agreement that human activity contributes to climate change. The major culprits are greenhouse gas emissions, primarily carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O), which trap heat in the Earth’s atmosphere. These gases come from burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas), deforestation, agriculture, and industrial processes.
However, this contribution must be rightly framed. Climate has always changed, long before the Industrial Revolution. The Medieval Warm Period (approx. 950–1250 AD) and the Little Ice Age (approx. 1300–1850 AD) both saw temperature shifts that affected agriculture, population movements, and societal development—without the aid of SUVs or air conditioning.
When ancient human remains are uncovered in areas now covered by ice, it suggests not only warming today but habitable conditions in the past. Climate fluctuation is the historical norm—not the exception.
And here lies a deeper truth: God made humans capable of adaptation. From Genesis onward, man has migrated, adjusted, and innovated in response to changing climates. Far from being fragile, human civilization is resilient by divine design.
4. Can Human Behavior Reverse Climate Change?
There is significant uncertainty about the degree to which changes in human behavior can substantially alter global climate trends. Even radical shifts—net-zero emissions, banning internal combustion engines, eliminating meat consumption—may only reduce predicted temperature increases by tenths of a degree by the end of the century, according to some models.
Developing nations like China and India—two of the top global polluters—are under few constraints, meaning that even the most aggressive Western decarbonization will have limited global impact while imposing massive local costs.
Moreover, the Earth’s climate system is complex and subject to natural cycles and feedback loops. Models are useful tools but often based on assumptions and highly sensitive to initial inputs. Many predictions made in the 1980s and 1990s have failed to materialize.
This is not an argument for complacency, but for humility. Man can affect the environment—for better or worse—but he cannot play God.
5. Climate Change and Migration: Reality or Excuse?
Activists often claim that climate change is causing mass migration. Rising sea levels, crop failure, and drought are said to make entire regions uninhabitable, creating “climate refugees.” This narrative has been echoed in speeches at the United Nations and cited to justify lenient immigration policies in the West.
But the evidence does not support this claim. The vast majority of migration is driven by economics, crime, political instability, or war—not climate. People are fleeing corrupt regimes, drug cartels, and socialism—not sea levels.
Labeling migrants as “climate refugees” is often a political tactic designed to pressure Western nations into accepting large numbers of people under the guise of environmental justice. It also serves globalist interests in eroding national borders and enforcing international governance under the pretense of humanitarian concern.
6. Myths of the Climate Change Movement
There are several myths routinely propagated by climate activists:
- “The science is settled” – Science is a process of inquiry. Consensus does not equal truth.
- “The Earth will be uninhabitable in 12 years” – Alarmist predictions from figures like Greta Thunberg and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are rarely grounded in data and often contradict real-world trends.
- “Climate disasters are increasing due to climate change” – Weather events have always occurred, and trends are not consistently worsening when adjusted for population and reporting.
- “We must eliminate fossil fuels at all costs” – Fossil fuels have lifted billions out of poverty. The cost of abrupt energy transitions could cause more human suffering than climate change itself. In fact, fossil fuels have enabled humans to thrive better in harsher climates. Consider heating and air conditioning and the substantial reduction in weather-related deaths due to them.
- “Eating meat destroys the planet” – This idea often comes from radical eco-ethics and anti-human ideologies, not agricultural science.
7. Takeaways from the Climate Debate
Despite the distortions, some valid insights remain:
- Pollution harms life – Industrial waste, dirty water, and deforestation have real costs.
- Innovation is good – Cleaner technologies and better efficiency can benefit people and the planet.
- Local conservation matters – Forest management, sustainable agriculture, and proper waste disposal should be priorities.
But the discussion must be grounded in truth, not hysteria, and must reflect the reality that man is not a cancer on the planet—he is God’s steward upon it.
8. Globalist Agendas: Climate as a Cover
Many politicians and global institutions are using climate change as a pretext for broader ideological agendas. These include:
- The Great Reset – Proposing a restructured economy where governments, corporations, and technocrats control consumption, ownership, and travel.
- Carbon tracking and surveillance – Promoting individual carbon budgets and digital IDs.
- Climate reparations – Demanding wealth transfers from industrialized nations to the Global South.
- Depopulation policies – Linking environmental sustainability with population control and reduced fertility.
What’s being advanced is not environmental stewardship—it’s a new form of technocratic control masquerading as environmentalism.
9. A Christian View of the Environment
Christians affirm that “The Earth is the LORD’s and the fullness thereof” (Psalm 24:1, ESV). We are caretakers of creation, not owners. Stewardship includes:
- Preserving beauty and order in creation,
- Avoiding reckless exploitation, and
- Using resources wisely for human flourishing and God’s glory.
But we are not at the mercy of nature. God is sovereign over climate, and He has not left us alone. He has created us with the capacity to adapt, migrate, invent, and steward His world in the face of change.
Ultimately, the Christian hope is not in a stabilized climate—but in a new heavens and a new Earth where righteousness dwells (2 Peter 3:13).
Conclusion: Stewardship Over Fear
Yes, climate change exists. Yes, man plays a role. But no, the crisis narrative is not always honest, and the policy “solutions” often conceal other ambitions.
As Christians and thoughtful citizens, we must:
- Reject doomsday alarmism,
- Uphold truth in science and policy,
- Expose ideological manipulation,
- And pursue faithful stewardship under God’s providence.
We are not cosmic accidents. We are not alone. We are stewards of a world made by a wise Creator, and our task is not to panic—but to govern it wisely, humbly, and in reverent fear of the One who holds the weather in His hand.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
rob@basedchristianity.org
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
Some sources of information may reflect a libertarian and/or atheistic perspective. I may not agree with all of their opinions, but they offer some worthwhile comments on the topic under discussion.
Additionally, language used in the videos may be coarse. Coarse language does not reflect my personal standards.
Finally, those on the left often criticize my sources of information, which are primarily conservative and/or Christian. Truth is truth, regardless of how we feel about it. Leftists are largely led by their emotion rather than facts. It is no small wonder that they would criticize the sources that I provide. And, ultimately, my wordview is governed by Scripture. Many of my critics are not biblical Christians.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at rob@basedchristianity.org if you want to comment on something, though.
I will continue to add items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.