Madalyn Murray O’Hair was one of the most infamous atheists in American history. She became a household name in the 1960s after spearheading legal efforts that resulted in the removal of mandatory Bible reading and prayer from public schools. Her confrontational style, profane language, and open contempt for Christianity made her a controversial figure both in the courtroom and the public eye. Yet behind her activism was a personal life marked by relational dysfunction, especially with her children, one of whom later converted to Christianity and offered a sobering insider view of growing up under her roof.
This essay will examine O’Hair’s life, her major legal battles, the nature of her relationship with her children, her ultimate fate, and how Christians should respond to such a legacy.
Early Life and Radicalization
Madalyn Mays (later O’Hair) was born in 1919 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Raised in a Presbyterian family, she grew up during the Great Depression and served in the Women’s Army Corps during World War II. Her outspoken views on religion intensified during her adult life, particularly during the Cold War years when she traveled to Europe and was reportedly denied entry into the Soviet Union—a nation she admired for its atheism and state socialism.
Her animosity toward Christianity reportedly escalated after her attempts to defect to the USSR failed. She returned embittered and disillusioned, channeling her fury into legal activism against religion in American public life.
The Landmark Court Case: Murray v. Curlett
In 1960, O’Hair filed a lawsuit against the Baltimore school system after discovering that her son, William J. Murray, was subjected to mandatory Bible readings at school. The case, Murray v. Curlett, was consolidated with Abington School District v. Schempp and decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1963. In an 8–1 decision, the Court ruled that mandatory Bible readings in public schools were unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
This case effectively ended public school-sponsored Bible reading and prayer across the nation and made O’Hair a symbol of secularism. She responded to the victory with disdain toward religious America, calling the result “a victory for freedom.”
Founding of American Atheists
Following her legal triumph, O’Hair founded American Atheists in 1963. The organization became a hub for legal challenges against public religious displays and was known for its aggressive rhetoric.
Her style was intentionally provocative. She referred to religion as “garbage” and described Christianity as “a crutch for weak people.” O’Hair claimed:
“Religion has caused more misery to all of mankind in every stage of human history than any other single idea.”
She openly mocked Christian theology, saying:
“An atheist believes that a hospital should be built instead of a church. An atheist believes that a deed must be done instead of a prayer said.”
Her personal disdain for Christians was laced with foul language, and she often used vulgarities in public interviews and written materials. Her son, William, later remarked that her speech was regularly peppered with words unrepeatable in polite company.
Personal Life and Relationship with Her Children
Madalyn Murray O’Hair had two sons—William J. Murray (from a previous relationship) and Jon Garth Murray (adopted by her second husband). She also had a granddaughter, Robin Murray O’Hair, Jon’s daughter.
Her family dynamics were dysfunctional and authoritarian. William, her eldest son, bore the brunt of her public activism as the child named in the lawsuit that reached the Supreme Court. But their relationship deteriorated over time, especially as William began to explore Christianity.
In 1980, William J. Murray publicly professed faith in Christ and became a Southern Baptist. This was an emotional and ideological betrayal in Madalyn’s eyes. She disowned him completely, calling him “an absolute ignoramus” and “a post-natal abortion if ever there was one.” She claimed he was “dead to her.”
William described life with Madalyn as one filled with rage, control, and bitterness. In his book “My Life Without God”, he wrote:
“My mother was a tyrant. There was no love in our house, only fear. She ruled with emotional and intellectual terror.”
He noted that profanity and blasphemy were everyday occurrences and that any mention of God in the home would result in a violent outburst.
Despite her fierce advocacy for freedom from religion, her household was anything but free. William later commented that his mother “hated God but couldn’t stop talking about Him.”
The Tragic End: Murder and Missing Bodies
In 1995, Madalyn, her son Jon Garth, and granddaughter Robin mysteriously disappeared. Suspicion soon mounted, and investigations pointed to financial irregularities involving American Atheists.
Eventually, it was revealed that a former employee, David Roland Waters—whom O’Hair had previously accused of theft—had kidnapped and murdered all three family members. Waters and his accomplices extorted over $500,000 from the family before killing them, dismembering their bodies, and burying the remains on a remote Texas ranch.
In 2001, authorities discovered the skeletal remains of Madalyn, Jon, and Robin. DNA testing confirmed their identities. The gruesome nature of her death was a sobering and ironic end for a woman who had spent her life warring against the God of Scripture.
How Should the Christian Church View O’Hair and Her Legacy?
Christians should not gloat over Madalyn Murray O’Hair’s demise. Scripture teaches:
“Do not rejoice when your enemy falls, and let not your heart be glad when he stumbles” (Proverbs 24:17).
Instead, her life and death serve as a sobering warning. Romans 1 describes those who “suppress the truth in unrighteousness” and are “given over to a debased mind.” O’Hair’s life is a tragic demonstration of that descent—rebellion against God, broken relationships, an empire built on blasphemy, and ultimately, a violent and lonely end.
Yet the grace of God is still evident in her story through her son. William’s conversion and ministry are testimonies that God can redeem even the darkest legacies. It also reminds the Church of its duty to pray for enemies of the Gospel and not to shrink from proclaiming truth in an age of hostility.
As William said:
“No one is beyond the reach of the gospel. If God can save me, the poster child for atheist indoctrination, He can save anyone.”
Conclusion
Madalyn Murray O’Hair left a profound mark on American life. Her court victories reshaped public education. Her rhetoric emboldened secularists. But her personal life was marred by hostility, estrangement, and ultimately violence. While her activism removed prayer from classrooms, it could not remove the ache from her own soul—a soul made in the image of God but in rebellion against Him.
Her legacy should compel Christians not to retreat in the face of opposition, but to stand firm in grace and truth, remembering that the fiercest opponents of Christ—like Saul of Tarsus, or William Murray—can still become His followers. We must preach boldly, love earnestly, and pray fervently, even for the enemies of the cross.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
rob@basedchristianity.org
RELATED CONTENT
William J. Murray is interviewed by Vic Eliason on the Crosstalk Youtube channel. I am not very familiar with Vic Eliason, so I won’t vouch for his ministry. However, this interview should be fine.
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
I think the content is worthwhile, but it may contain opinions or language I don’t agree with.
Realize that I sometimes use phrases like “trans man”, “trans woman”, “transgender” or similar language for ease of communication. Obviously, as a conservative Christian, I don’t believe anyone has ever become the opposite sex.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at rob@basedchristianity.org if you want to comment on something afterwards, though.
I will continue to add videos and other items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.